Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 476 So. 2d 1262 - Linehan v. State

476 So. 2d 1262 - Linehan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
3
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 73 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Harich v. Dugger (1988), 619 So. 2d 285 - Sochor v. State (1993)

3 federal appellate · 73 state decisions

2601985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · 419 So. 2d 1194 - Thomas v. Ratiner · 402 So. 2d 606 - State v. Hawkins · Demps v. Florida · In re Trial Courts of the Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the defendant must come forward with evidence of intoxication at the time of the offense sufficient to establish that he was unable to form the intent necessary to commit the crime charged.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Reaves v. State · Randolph v. State
  2. “where the evidence shows the use of intoxicants but does not show intoxication, the instruction is not required.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Savage v. State · 520 So. 2d 1 - Robinson v. State
  3. “(1) Any person who willfully and unlawfully, or while in the commission of any felony, by fire or explosion, damages or causes to be damaged: (a) Any dwelling, whether occupied or not, or its contents; [[Image here]] is guilty of arson in the first degree....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. T.E. v. State · 708 So. 2d 918 - Frey v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.