476 So. 2d 161 - State v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

cited by 41 later decisions

states following

October 2013

most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably 482 So. 2d 346 - Wade v. State (1986), 476 So. 2d 165 - State v. Carney (1985)

41 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 476 So. 2d 158 - Albritton v. State · 455 So. 2d 551 - Young v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“When a departure sentence is grounded on both permissible and impermissible reasons, the sentence should be reversed and the case remanded for resentencing unless the state is able to show beyond a reasonable doubt that the absence of the impermissible reason(s) would not have affected the departure sentence.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 479 So. 2d 739 - Griffin v. State · 476 So. 2d 165 - State v. Carney
“WHEN AN APPELLATE COURT FINDS THAT A SENTENCING COURT HAS RELIED ON ONE OR MORE IMPERMISSIBLE REASONS FOR DEPARTING FROM THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES, AND HAS ALSO RELIED ON ONE OR MORE PERMISSIBLE REASONS, MAY THE APPELLATE COURT APPLY THE HARMLESS ERROR RULE AND AFFIRM THE SENTENCE?”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 479 So. 2d 739 - Griffin v. State · 478 So. 2d 1071 - Von Carter v. State
“It is clear that the district court was unable to determine beyond a reasonable doubt that the impermissible reasons did not affect the departure sentence. We approve the decision reversing the sentence and remanding the case for resentencing.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 494 So. 2d 222 - Nixon v. State · 483 So. 2d 423 - State v. Baker

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.