State v. Hookfin’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently November 2007 · most notably 566 So. 2d 1127 - State v. Shepherd (1990), 653 So. 2d 1288 - State v. Glynn (1995)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Solem v. Helm · Monroe v. Louisiana · State v. Prestridge · 459 So. 2d 31 - State v. Richardson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“abundantly clear from the witness' exchange with defense counsel during cross examination that she did not remember Joe's precise statement made during their interview until after examining a transcript of that interview. Thus, an adequate foundation was laid for permitting the witness to refresh her memory by reference to the transcribed interview.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The lapse of time between the first opportunity for the victim to make the complaint and the making of the complaint itself seems to be the key factor in deciding whether such statement is admissible. Where the statement is made by the victim at the first opportunity to do so safely, the court has held that such statement is admissible.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Burt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.