Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 476 So. 2d 632 - Ex Parte State

476 So. 2d 632 - Ex Parte State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2013

19 state decisions

1001985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Aguilar v. Texas · Beck v. State of Ohio · Brown v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A 'bare-bones' affidavit can be validated if it is supplemented with additional facts which the magistrate considered before determining that probable cause was present.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]ffidavits, like the one in the present action, which consist solely of the affiant's conclusion that the named individual committed an offense, without setting forth the facts upon which the conclusion is based, are fatally defective.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"`Sufficient information must be presented to the magistrate to allow that official to determine probable cause; his action cannot be a mere ratification of the bare conclusions of others. In order to ensure that such an abdication of the magistrate's duty does not occur, courts must continue to conscientiously review the sufficiency of affidavits on which warrants are issued.'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.