Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 476 So. 2d 654 - Downs v. Wainwright

476 So. 2d 654 - Downs v. Wainwright’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
November 1994
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Evitts v. Lucey · Downs v. Florida · 461 So. 2d 109 - Ruffin v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]s noted in Downs v. Wainwright, 476 So.2d 654, 657 (Fla. 1985), `[w]e have repeatedly held that appellate counsel cannot be considered ineffective for failing to raise issues which he was procedurally barred from raising because they were not properly raised at trial.' See also Ruffin v. Wainwright, 461 So.2d 109 (Fla. 1984).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.