476 So. 2d 754 - Gallagher v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2007
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 454 So. 2d 792 - Vileta v. State · 422 So. 2d 994 - Kruckenberg v. Powell · 464 So. 2d 689 - Farrow v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]ne guideline scoresheet shall be utilized for each defendant covering all offenses pending before the court for sentencing”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“the Committee Note which makes the sentencing court responsible for the accurate preparation of scoresheets compels us to place the burden upon the trial court to assure that all of the defendant's cases pending for sentencing in a particular county at the time of that defendant's first sentencing hearing are disposed of using one scoresheet.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“the spirit of [Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(1) mandating preparation of one scoresheet for all offenses pending for sentencing] would be defeated by allowing separate sentencing based on separate scoresheets where, as here, the sentences are imposed on the same day in combined proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.