State v. Pearson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 15, 1985

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-10-15

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 2000

3 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Does the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule apply in probation revocation proceedings in light of the 1983 amend ment to Article I, Section 12, of the Florida Constitution?”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including 486 So. 2d 682 - State v. Uriguen, 487 So. 2d 1054 - State v. Pearson

Relies on 463 So. 2d 1236 - Tamer v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-10-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the order of the trial court upholding the “knock and announce” Rule of Exclusion, as has the Fourth District Court of Appeal, See Tamer v. State, 463 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), and as they have done, we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question as one of great public interest.

¶2 *761“Does the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule apply in probation revocation proceedings in light of the 1983 amendment to Article I, Section 12, of the Florida Constitution?”

¶3Affirmed.