Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 476 S.W.2d 197 - Hamilton v. Hamilton

Hamilton v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2006

8 state decisions

701972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pittsburg, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Bartels

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Application of payments. Any order of support issued by a court of this state when acting as a responding state shall not supersede any previous order of support issued in a divorce or separate maintenance action, but the amounts for a particular period paid pursuant to either order shall be credited against amounts accruing or accrued for the same period under both.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.