Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 476 S.W.2d 854 - Pledger v. Ools

Pledger v. Ools’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1980
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Walker v. Cleere · Patterson v. Hall · Sommer v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The filing of the record in the appellate court within the time prescribed by Rule 385 is jurisdictional. Walker v. Cleere, 141 Tex. 550 , 174 S.W.2d 956 (1943). Before an extension of time may be granted under the rule, the motion for additional time must show ‘good cause therefor.’ Rule 376 provides that the appellant ‘shall promptly file with the clerk’ a written direction to prepare the transcript. The rule does not fix the time that shall be considered prompt action in ordering the transcript, and our courts have held ‘promptly’ to mean within a reasonable time in light of all the attendant facts and circumstances.” Pledger v. Ools, 476 S.W.2d 854, 856 (Tex.Civ.App.—Amarillo 1972, no writ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.