Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 476 U.S. 253 - Brock v. Pierce County

Brock v. Pierce County’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

864
cited by 864 later decisions
17
cited 17 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

346 federal appellate · 115 district · 60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 864 later decisions (17 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2026 · most notably Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency (2007), United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property (1993)

346 federal appellate · 115 district · 60 state decisions — followed in 16 states

322019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedPierce County v. United States (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Mohasco Corp. v. Silver · Guaranty Trust Co of New York v. United States · Batson v. Kentucky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 864 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “would be most reluctant to conclude that every failure of an agency to observe a procedural requirement voids subsequent agency action, especially when important public rights are at stake.”
    44 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “compel agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed,”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the mere use of the word 'shall' in [29 U.S.C. Sec. 816(b) ], standing alone, [was] not enough to remove the Secretary's power to act after 120 days.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.