Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 476 U.S. 693 - Bowen v. Roy

Bowen v. Roy’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

726
cited by 726 later decisions
31
cited 31 times by the Supreme Court
25
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

241 federal appellate · 65 district · 142 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 726 later decisions (31 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2025 · most notably Employment Division Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. L Smith (1990), Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah (1993)

241 federal appellate · 65 district · 142 state decisions — followed in 25 states

189019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1996 (American Indian Religious Freedom Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 7 U.S.C. § 2011 (Charitable Assistance and Food Bank Act of 1987) · 7 U.S.C. § 2025

Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Townsend v. Sain · McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher · Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Shapiro v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 726 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he Free Exercise Clause simply cannot be understood to require the Government to conduct its own internal affairs in ways that comport with the religious beliefs of particular citizens.”
    24 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Absent proof of an intent to discriminate against particular religious beliefs or against religion in general, the Government meets its burden when it demonstrates that a challenged requirement for governmental benefits, neutral and uniform in its application, is a reasonable means of promoting a legitimate public interest.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “a state creates such a mechanism, its refusal to extend an exemption to an instance of religious hardship suggests a discriminatory intent,”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.