In re Soderstrom’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1107 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 704
Relies on Wallis v. Justice Oaks II, Ltd. · 450 So. 2d 1114 - Dania Jai-Alai Palace, Inc. v. Sykes · Rivercity v. Herpel · 718 F. Supp. 260 - Mobil Oil Corporation v. Linear Films, Inc. · Hillsborough Holdings Corp. v. Celotex Corp. (In Re Hillsborough Holdings Corp.)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this case, under these circumstances, a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.