Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 477 F.2d 1073 - Conover v. Montemuro

Conover v. Montemuro’s Empirical Analysis

477 F.2d 1073 · 1972

Citation profile

116
cited by 116 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

57 federal appellate · 9 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 116 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2023 · most notably Gerstein v. Pugh (1975), Sosna v. Iowa (1975)

57 federal appellate · 9 district · 4 state decisions

690197219801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2281 · 28 U.S.C. § 2283

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Erie Co v. Tompkins · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Younger v. Harris · Mapp v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “G. Even if a state prosecution is pending, injunctive or declaratory relief against state officers with respect to violations of federal constitutional rights not amounting to an injunction which will halt or substantially interfere with a pending prosecution may still be available.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Since a remedy with respect to the intake procedures would not necessarily interfere with the adjudication functions of the Commonwealth’s juvenile court, it is therefore not necessarily precluded by Younger v. Harris, supra, or Samuels v. Mackell, [ 401 U.S. 66 , 91 S.Ct. 764 , 27 L.Ed.2d 688 ] supra.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Upon an issue of such significance, when to decide is not necessary, it may well be necessary not to decide.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.