Rogers v. Roth’s Empirical Analysis
477 F.2d 1154 · 1973
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2022
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Calhoun v. United States · Straub v. Reading Co. · Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Wray Equipment Corp. · Usiak v. New York Tank Barge Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... so much of the deposition as was properly used to show a subsequent inconsistent statement, because the complete answer of the declarant in the deposition was not used, but only part. This was incomplete and misleading... .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carroll v. State“If a witness gives a deposition and signature is not waived, he may later make changes . . . and give reasons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.