United States v. Cleveland’s Empirical Analysis
477 F.2d 310 · 1973
Citation profile
37 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2002 · most notably United States v. Papia (1977), Erckman v. United States (1974)
37 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Holland v. United States · United States v. Johnson · Rutkin v. United States · Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a writing prepared by a Government lawyer relating to the subject matter of the testimony of a Government witness that has been “signed or otherwise adopted or approved” by the Government witness is producible under the Jencks Act, and is not rendered nonproducible because a Government lawyer interviews the witness and writes the “statement.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“includes the report of a government agent who testified as a prosecution witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.