Rudd v. Florida’s Empirical Analysis
477 F.2d 805 · 1973
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably Anderson v. Maggio (1977), Brathwaite v. Manson (1975)
17 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Wade · Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Stovall v. Denno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any simultaneous identification of a suspect by two or more witnesses in the presence of each other is so impermissibly suggestive as to amount to a denial of due process, and any subsequent in-court identifications must be subjected to a Per se exclusionary rule.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“did not specifically find that the showup was likely to induce irreparable misidentification, a finding indispensable to proper application of the Simmons test.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.