Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 477 F.3d 1002 - Osborne v. Grussing

Osborne v. Grussing’s Empirical Analysis

477 F.3d 1002 · 2007

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
April 2023
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 2023

9 federal appellate · 4 district ·

180200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Hartman v. Moore · Hebert v. Brown · United States v. Berrios · Miles v. Burgess

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must make the same showing that is required to establish a claim of selective prosecution—“that he has been singled out for prosecution while others similarly situated have not been prosecuted for conduct similar to that for which he was prosecuted [and] that the government’s discriminatory selection of him for prosecution was based upon ... his exercise of his first amendment right to free speech.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “such a complaint results in enforcement action, we do not impute the complainant’s ulterior motive to the government enforcers”). Rather, Hensel’s selective-enforcement”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “with retaliation claims by citizens seeking to avoid the consequences of their illegal actions”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.