United States v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis
477 F.3d 215 · 2007
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably United States v. Delgado (2012), United States v. John (2010)
24 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998) · 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3559 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Olano · Stirone v. United States · Farmer v. Seiter · 121 Wash. 2d 22 - State v. Riley · United States v. Bieganowski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a claim of evidentiary insufficiency will be rejected unless 'the record is devoid of evidence pointing to guilt' or if the evidence is 'so tenuous that a conviction is shocking.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.