Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 477 F.3d 347 - Leonard v. Robinson

Leonard v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

477 F.3d 347 · 2007

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
April 2025
most recently cited

22 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Fritz v. Charter Township of Com-Stock (2010), Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. Napolitano (2011)

22 federal appellate ·

550200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The party opposing summary judgment cannot rest on its pleading or allegations, to prevail, they must present material evidence in support of their allegations.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242 , 250, 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) (citation omitted).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'For a right to be clearly established, the contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.