477 F. Supp. 632 - Cunningham v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404
Relies on Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Continental Grain Company v. The Fbl-585 · Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp. · A. Olinick & Sons v. Dempster Bros. · Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. v. Ritter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... relative ease of access to sources of proof; availability of compulsory process for attendance of unwilling, and the cost of obtaining attendance of willing, witnesses; ... and all other practical problems that make a trial easy, expeditious, and inexpensive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.