Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

477 Mich. 852

720 N.W.2d 740

Docket Docket No. 130888. COA No. 266906.

People v. Arnold

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Jeffrey ARNOLD, Defendant-Appellant.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 2006.

Michigan Supreme Court · decided 2006-09-14

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2008

2 federal appellate ·

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · People v Pubrat · Smrekar v. Jeep Corporation

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-09-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the February 27, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Tuscola Circuit Court for resentencing. A defendant facing incarceration has the right to counsel at all critical stages of the criminal process. People v. Williams,470 Mich. 634, 641, 683 N.W.2d 597 (2004). Sentencing is a critical stage. People v. Pubrat,451 Mich. 589, 594, 548 N.W.2d 595 (1996). The complete denial of counsel at a critical stage of a criminal proceeding, as occurred in this case, is structural error requiring automatic reversal. See Gideon v. Wainwright,372 U.S. 335, 344-345, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963); People v. Duncan,462 Mich. 47, 51-52, 610 N.W.2d 551 (2000).

¶2We do not retain jurisdiction.

/477/mich/852 · .json · Public domain