¶1On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 31, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
477 Mich. 976
725 N.W.2d 26
Docket Docket No. 132200, COA No. 270603.
Hamel v. Rao
Kevin HAMEL and Kathleen Hamel, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Sudhir B. RAO, M.D., and Big Rapids Orthopaedics, P.C., Defendants-Appellants, and Mecosta County General Hospital, Defendant.
Decided December 28, 2006.
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 2006-12-28
Decided 2006-12-28