¶1On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the October 3, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.
477 Mich. 982
725 N.W.2d 352
Docket Docket No. 132464, COA No. 259943.
Randolph v. Reisig
E. Richard RANDOLPH and Betty J. Randolph, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Clarence E. REISIG, Monica Reisig, William Hinkley, and Debra Hinkley, Defendants-Appellants.
Decided January 4, 2007.
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 2007-01-04
Decided 2007-01-04