Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 477 N.E.2d 857 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
7
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably State v. Ortiz (1997), Cuppett v. Duckworth (1993)

1 federal appellate · 50 state decisions

2401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burgett v. Texas · Elmore v. State · Davis v. State · Hall v. State · Lisenko v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The law presumes that a judge is unbiased and unprejudiced in the matters which come before the judge. A judge has the discretionary power to disqualify himself or herself sua sponte whenever any semblance of judicial bias or impropriety comes to the judge's attention. Additionally, where a judge has actual prejudice in a case, justice requires that a sua sponte judicial disqualification from the case be made. Nelson v. State (1982), Ind. App., 436 N.E.2d 1153 . The record must show actual bias and prejudice against the defendant before a conviction will be reversed on the ground that the trial judge should have been so disqualified. Jones v. State (1981), Ind. App., 416 N.E.2d 880 ."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]t is incumbent upon defendant to object at the earliest opportunity when his trial date is scheduled beyond the time limits prescribed by Ind. R.Crim. P. 4(B)(1).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “was aware of his right to representation [by counsel]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.