State v. Gohl’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (Indian Crimes Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 18 U.S.C. § 1162 · 18 U.S.C. § 1167 (§ 23 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 25 U.S.C. § 2702 (§ 3 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 25 U.S.C. § 2703 (§ 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 28 U.S.C. § 1360
Relies on White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker · Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation · Elby's Big Boy of Steubenville, Inc. v. Frisch's Restaurants, Inc. · United States v. Azure · 114 Wis. 2d 418 - State v. Webster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The right of appeal is governed solely by statute in this state. Without any statutory basis to hear an appeal, this Court must take notice of the lack of jurisdiction and dismiss the appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Deutscher
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.