Chipokas v. Hugg’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2016
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Milne · Thorp Credit, Inc. v. Gott · Miller v. Lawlor · Severson v. Elberon Elevator, Inc. · Johnson v. Pattison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hether we focus solely on the words of the proposal or consider its meaning in the surrounding circumstances, we are unable to find a clear and definite agreement that the [defendant] would reasonably understand to induce action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.