¶1Affirmed. Marsh v. Marsh, 419 So.2d 629 (Fla.1982); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Hu v. Hu, 432 So.2d 1389 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 431 So.2d 716 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Szot v. Szot, 425 So.2d 172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Douglass v. Jones, 422 So.2d 352 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Lee B. Stern & Co. v. Green, 398 So.2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Watts v. Haun, 393 So.2d 54 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Liberman v. Kelso, 354 So.2d 137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Croft v. Young, 188 So.2d 859 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966); Rosenblatt v. American Cyanamid, Co., 86 S.Ct. 1, 15 L.Ed.2d 39 (1965); Section 48.193 Florida Statutes (1983).
477 So. 2d 12
Strode v. Strode
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 1, 1985
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-10-01
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 419 So. 2d 629 - Marsh v. Marsh · 393 So. 2d 54 - Watts v. Haun
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1985-10-01
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 2016
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →