Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

477 So. 2d 565

477 So.2d 565

10 Fla.L.Weekly 569

Docket No. 66081.

State v. Davis

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Robert Gene DAVIS, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 17, 1985.

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1985-10-17

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Psychological trauma arising from extraordinary circumstances which are clearly not inherent in the offense charged may properly serve as a clear and convincing reason for departure.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 509 So. 2d 281 - State v. Rousseau

Relies on 475 So. 2d 1218 - Hendrix v. State · 458 So. 2d 42 - Davis v. State · 475 So. 2d 1221 - Gregory v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-10-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2016

15 state decisions

1301985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Joan Fowler Rossin, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

¶2Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Tatjana Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

¶3OVERTON, Justice.

¶4This is a petition to review Davis v. State,458 So.2d 42 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), remanding respondent's case for resentencing because the trial court used both permissible and impermissible reasons to depart from the sentencing guidelines. The district court certified the following question as a matter of great public importance:

If the scoresheets make provision for prior convictions, can those convictions also constitute clear and convincing reasons for aggravated punishment outside the guidelines?

¶5Id. at 44. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

¶6We answered that question in Hendrix v. State,475 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 1985), in which we held that, since prior convictions are already factored in as a part of the presumptive guidelines sentence, they may not be used as a clear and convincing reason for departure. See also Deer v. State,476 So.2d 163 (Fla. 1985); Gregory v. State,475 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 1985).

¶7Accordingly, we approve the decision of the district court.

¶8It is so ordered.

¶9BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

/477/so2d/565 · .json · Public domain