Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 477 So. 2d 566 - Jones v. State

477 So. 2d 566 - Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably 658 So. 2d 523 - Haines City Community Dev. v. Heggs (1995), 520 So. 2d 250 - State v. Pettis (1988)

52 state decisions

3101985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kilgore v. Bird · 97 So. 2d 693 - Brooks v. Owens · 476 So. 2d 144 - State v. C.C. · Brinson v. Tharin · Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Bunting

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The required “departure from the essential requirements of law” means something far beyond legal error. It means an inherent illegality or irregularity, an abuse of judicial power, an act of judicial tyranny perpetrated with disregard of procedural requirements, resulting in a gross miscarriage of justice. The writ of certiorari properly issues to correct essential illegality but not legal error.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “departure from the essential requirements of law”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Moreover, we approved State v. G.P. and held that no right of review by certiorari exists if no right of appeal exists.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.