477 So. 2d 572 - Hall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 1987
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · 345 So. 2d 1061 - Cumbie v. State · 410 So. 2d 916 - Cuciak v. State · 377 So. 2d 1153 - Cooper v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“IS A NEW TRIAL REQUIRED WHEN THE TRIAL COURT'S FAILURE TO CONDUCT A RICHARDSON INQUIRY IS, IN THE OPINION OF THE REVIEWING COURT, HARMLESS ERROR BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT?”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“change the per se rule which it created,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.