In re Pick & Save, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 1141 · 11 U.S.C. § 501 · 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 11 U.S.C. § 503 · 11 U.S.C. § 507
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams · Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. Davenport · Nobelman v. American Savings Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[it] is not timely filed, except to the extent tardily filed as permitted under paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of section 726(a) of this title or under the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, except that a claim of a governmental unit shall be timely filed if it is filed before 180 days after the date of the order for relief or such later time as the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure may provide, and except that in a case under chapter 13, a claim of a governmental unit for a tax with respect to a return filed under section 1308 shall be timely if the claim is filed on or before the date that is 60 days after the date on which such return was filed as required. 11 U.S.C. § 502 (b)(9).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Martinez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.