Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 478 F.2d 1320 - United States v. Conner

United States v. Conner’s Empirical Analysis

478 F.2d 1320 · 1973

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
5
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently May 2011 · most notably United States v. Mancillas (1978), Bower v. State (1989)

40 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions

31019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312

Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · Brown v. United States · Hilbrich v. United States · Schwachter v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) mere 'technical trespass' did not transform an otherwise reasonable investigation into a unreasonable search.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The circumstances here are also entirely different from the coercive situation found”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.