Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 478 F.2d 398 - Smith v. United States

Smith v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

478 F.2d 398 · 1973

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
March 2016
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Boulez v. Commissioner (1987), Capitol Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Commissioner (1991)

12 federal appellate · 2 district ·

6019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6532

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Ellington v. Blumstein · Luhring v. Glotzbach · The Cleveland Trust Company and A. Dean Perry, Executors of the Estate of Helen Wade Greene, Deceased v. United States of America, the Cleveland Trust Company and A. Dean Perry, Executors of the Estate of Helen Wade Greene, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Cross v. United States of America, Defendant-Cross · Rosenberg v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the provisions of the Statement of Procedural Rules are merely directory, and not mandatory”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.