Jerome Rosenberg v. Raymond v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
478 F.2d 520 · 1973
Citation profile
67 federal appellate · 18 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 196 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably Johnson v. Glick (1973), Duchesne v. Sugarman (1977)
67 federal appellate · 18 district · 11 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Roe v. Wade · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Eisenstadt v. Baird
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 196 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(c) Relation Back of Amendments. Whenever the claim or defense asserted in the amended pleading arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth or attempted to be set forth in the original pleading, the amendment relates back to the date of the original pleading. ...”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage““As said by Judge Laramore in Snoqualmie Tribe v. United States, 372 F.2d 951, 960 , 178 Ct.Cl. 570 (1967), ‘the inquiry in a determination of whether a claim should relate back will focus on the notice given by the general fact situation set forth in the original pleading.’ ””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“the most intimate phases of personal life,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.