Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 478 F.2d 537 - Jane Doe v. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor

Jane Doe v. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor’s Empirical Analysis

478 F.2d 537 · 1973

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 5 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2018 · most notably Hicks v. Miranda (1975), Graham v. Solem (1984)

34 federal appellate · 5 district · 7 state decisions

32019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 3306 (Federal Unemployment Tax Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 7421 · 29 U.S.C. § 152 (§ 2 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 42 U.S.C. § 409 (§ 209 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co. · Cruz v. Hauck · 5 Cal. 3d 584 - Serrano v. Priest · Castro v. United States · Desist v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “until such time as the Court informs (them) that (they) are not.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “for want of a substantial federal question.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. ““[T]he exclusion of agriculture from unemployment compensation can be seen as an indirect subsidy of a ‘beneficent enterprise’, or as an effort to save the compensation fund from the drain which would result from the inclusion of another large ‘deficit industry,’ or even as a necessary political compromise without which it would have been impossible to inaugurate a most important reform in American institutions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.