Ontos Inc v. G J Ce Llc’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “all legal and equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case.” .Addressing the argument that the trustee had no standing to prosecute fraudulent transfer claims, the court in Zwim responded, “statute of limitations are not jurisdictional, but are merely affirmative defenses which, if not raised, can be waived.” . See also footnote 2 in Klingman , where that court acknowledged that, unlike here,”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In re C.D. Jones & Co. · Baldiga v. Moog, Inc. (In re Comprehensive Power, Inc.)

2. ““there is active and direct participation by the representatives of one corporation, apparently exercising some form of pervasive control, in the activities of another and there is some fraudulent or injurious consequence of the intercorpo-rate relationship” or when “there is a confused intermingling of activity of two or more corporations engaged in a common enterprise with substantial disregard of the separate nature of the corporate entities, or serious ambiguity about the manner and capacity in which the various corporations and their respective representatives are acting.” ... In such circumstances, courts may allow a plaintiff to pierce the corporate veil of limited liability in order to “provide a meaningful remedy for injuries and to avoid injustice.””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 529 F. Supp. 2d 254 - Zimmermann v. Cambridge Credit Counseling Corp. · Reed v. Zak (In re Zak)