Ordinola v. Hackman’s Empirical Analysis
478 F.3d 588 · 2007
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1546 · 18 U.S.C. § 3184 · 18 U.S.C. § 3186 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. Avagliano · Fernandez v. Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whenever there is a treaty or convention for extradition between the United States and any foreign government, or in cases arising under section 3181(b), any justice or judge of the United States, or any magistrate judge authorized so to do by a court of the United States, or any judge of a court of record of general jurisdiction of any State, may, upon complaint made under oath, charging any person found within his jurisdiction, with having committed within the jurisdiction of any such foreign government any of the crimes provided for by such treaty or convention, or provided for under section 3181(b), issue his warrant for the apprehension of the person so charged, that he may be brought before such justice, judge, or magistrate judge, to the end that the evidence of criminality may be heard and considered.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Known as 'the incidence test,' it asks whether (1) there was a violent political disturbance or uprising in the requesting country at the time of the alleged offense, and if so, (2) whether the alleged offense was incidental to or in the furtherance of the uprising.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“50 percent of Peruvian territory and approximately 65 percent of the country's population ... under a state of national emergency.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.