Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

478 F. App'x 528

Howards v. McLaughlin

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided July 18, 2012

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2012-07-18

Relies on Reichle v. Howards · Howards v. McLaughlin

Decided 2012-07-18

¶1 ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

PAUL KELLY, Circuit Judge.

¶2 This matter is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. In Howards v. McLaughlin, 634 F.3d 1131 (10th Cir.2011), we reversed the district court’s denial of qualified immunity as to all Secret Service Agents on Mr. Howards’ Fourth Amendment claims, id. at 1143. We also reversed the district court’s denial of qualified immunity on Mr. Howards’ First Amendment claim as to Agents Daniels and McLaughlin, but affirmed such denial as to Agents Reichle and Doyle. Id. at 1149-50.

¶3 The Supreme Court has now reversed our judgment, holding that Agents Reichle and Doyle also are entitled to qualified immunity on the First Amendment claim. Reichle v. Howards, — U.S. -, -, 132 S.Ct. 2088, 2097, 182 L.Ed.2d 985 *529 (2012). Accordingly, all these defendants are entitled to qualified immunity.

¶4 Therefore, we REVERSE the district court’s denial of qualified immunity as to these defendants and REMAND for entry of judgment in favor of these defendants.

*

¶5 This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

/478/fappx/528 · .json · Public domain