Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

478 F. App'x 759

Bradley v. Johnson & Johnson

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 13, 2012

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2012-09-13

Decided 2012-09-13

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Marquette Bradley appeals the district court’s order denying his complaint alleging wrongful death without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bradley v. Johnson & Johnson, No. 1:12-cv-00092-JCC-IDD, 2012 WL 1957812 (E.D.Va. May 30, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/478/fappx/759 · .json · Public domain