Bishop v. Lane’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2242 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Spencer v. State of Texas a Bell · Noyd v. McNamara · Hodges v. Rose · William H. Haggard v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, John Taylor Aldridge v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[mjost courts faced with the problem have held that once a judgment is entered the filing of an amendment cannot be allowed until the judgment is set aside or vacated under Rule 59 or Rule 60.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jackson v. Russell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.