Malmed v. Thornburgh’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Relies on Stanley v. Illinois · Dandridge v. Williams · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · Reynolds v. Sims · Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'the legislative facts on which the classification is apparently based could not reasonably be conceived to be true by the governmental decisionmaker.' " Id. at 1014 (quoting Vance v. Bradley, 440 U.S. at 111, 99 S.Ct. at 950). 12 Second, the court cited the provisions allowing judges over age seventy to perform as "senior judges”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Malmed v. Thornburgh“the record contains no proof of a relationship between advancing age and ability to perform the duties of a judge. On the contrary, the evidence before me belies the existence of any such relationship.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Malmed v. Thornburgh“The service of senior judges called back to perform duties has been essential to the administration of the court system in Pennsylvania in general and the court system in Philadelphia in particular.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Malmed v. Thornburgh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.