Casseus v. E. Bus Co.’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
22 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 213 · 45 U.S.C. § 151 (Railway Labor Act)
Relies on International Association of Machinists v. Central Airlines Inc · Sullivan v. Town of Brookline · Valerio v. Putnam Associates Inc. · Boswell v. Zephyr Lines, Inc. · Pereira v. New England LNG Co., Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all material facts have been established and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“When the meaning of any particular section or clause of a statute is questioned, it is proper, no doubt, to look into the other parts of the statute: otherwise the different sections of the same statute might be so construed as to be repugnant, and the intention of the [L]egislature might be defeated”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“de novo because we examine the same record and decide the same questions of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.