¶1On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
478 Mich. 866
731 N.W.2d 746
Docket Docket No. 132778. COA No. 266576.
Casey v. ASU GROUP
Everett CASEY and Maryalice Casey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ASU GROUP, and Meredith Reschly, Defendants, and Auto Owners Insurance Company, Home Owners Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Decided May 30, 2007.
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 2007-05-30
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2008
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2007-05-30
View the full empirical analysis of this case →