Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 478 NW2D 620 - State v. Petrie

State v. Petrie’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2019

12 state decisions

50199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Saadiq v. State · State v. Bessenecker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he sentencing court shall order that restitution be made by each offender to the victims of the offender’s criminal activities, to the clerk of court for fines, penalties, ... and, to the extent that the offender is reasonably able to pay, ... court costs ..., court-appointed attorney’s fees, or the expense of a public defender when applicable.... ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the impact statements 'told the judge little, if anything, that was not already apparent' " (citation omitted) ). Because their statements were cumulative, we conclude Slinker's attorney was not ineffective in failing to object. III. "[O]nly such fees and costs attributable to the charge on which a criminal defendant is convicted should be recoverable under a restitution plan,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Fees and costs not clearly associated with any single charge should be assessed proportionally against the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.