Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 478 N.W.2d 802 - Stotts v. Wright County

Stotts v. Wright County’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ridgewood Development Co. v. State · Advanced Training Systems Inc. v. Caswell Equipment Co. · VanLandschoot v. City of Mendota Heights · Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc. · County of Lake v. Courtney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It has arisen upon a contract, or transaction in the nature of a contract, authorized by statute and liabilities under that right have been so far determined that nothing remains to be done by the party asserting it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.