Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 1983
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Disheroon v. State · 6 Okla. Crim. 142 - Sies v. State · Lefthand v. State · 86 Okla. Crim. 323 - Crabb v. State · Meekins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[Hjowever, when the state presents its hypothesis, based on circumstantial evidence for the jury to consider, and no other hypothesis is offered for the jury to consider of said defendant’s plea of ‘not guilty’, the jury has little alternative but to consider that evidence presented to them; and when the state’s hypothesis is logical and reasonably supported by the evidence, the jury’s verdict will not be disturbed.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Faulkner v. State · Locke v. State““. . . Defendant proposes that the weak link in the chain of circumstances is that there was not a witness to place him in the . . . home. While such statement is correct, the other circumstantial evidence weaved a web about him sufficient to convince the jury that the crime was committed by the accused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Slavens v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.