Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 478 P2D 359 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 1983
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Disheroon v. State · 6 Okla. Crim. 142 - Sies v. State · Lefthand v. State · 86 Okla. Crim. 323 - Crabb v. State · Meekins v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[Hjowever, when the state presents its hypothesis, based on circumstantial evidence for the jury to consider, and no other hypothesis is offered for the jury to consider of said defendant’s plea of ‘not guilty’, the jury has little alternative but to consider that evidence presented to them; and when the state’s hypothesis is logical and reasonably supported by the evidence, the jury’s verdict will not be disturbed.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . Defendant proposes that the weak link in the chain of circumstances is that there was not a witness to place him in the . . . home. While such statement is correct, the other circumstantial evidence weaved a web about him sufficient to convince the jury that the crime was committed by the accused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.