Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 478 Pa. 147 - Commonwealth v. Mangini

Commonwealth v. Mangini’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
4
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 86 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably Commonwealth v. Holzer (1978), Commonwealth v. White (1995)

4 federal appellate · 86 state decisions

380197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · South Dakota v. Opperman · Cardwell v. Lewis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The test is whether accepting as true all of the evidence, direct or circumstantial, and all reasonable inferences therefrom upon which, if believed, the jury could, properly have based its verdict, it is sufficient in law to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty of the crime with which he has been charged.” Commonwealth v. Mangini, 478 Pa. 147, 152 , 386 A.2d 482, 484-85 (1978).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Evidence is admissible in rebuttal to contradict that offered by a defendant or his witnesses, even though by doing so the Commonwealth supplies previous omissions from its case in chief ... We have previously stated that the order of presentation of evidence is a matter of sound discretion for the trial court.” (Citations omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.