Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 478 Pa. 22 - Commonwealth v. Sanabria

Commonwealth v. Sanabria’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently December 2013 · most notably Commonwealth v. McNeil (1985), Commonwealth v. Nichols (1979)

35 state decisions

19019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Culombe v. Connecticut · Commonwealth v. Kichline · Commonwealth v. Paquette · Commonwealth Ex Rel. Butler v. Rundle · Commonwealth v. Rose

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Michael Myers, a co-defendant of appellant, pled guilty to murder generally for his involvement in the slaying of Elizabeth Bilger. No degree of guilt hearing had yet been conducted and, therefore, judgment of sentence had not been imposed upon Myers. Appellant subpoenaed Myers and sought the testimony of Myers to support his claim that he had no prior knowledge of the homicide. An in camera hearing was held at which time Myers indicated that he would invoke the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination. The Trial Court sustained this right. Appellant’s argument is based on a theory that once Myers pled guilty, even though not sentenced, he waived his Fifth Amendment protection. We do not agree with appellant’s contention.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.