Allen v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 1997
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Angrist v. United States · Cherek v. United States · Cleveland v. United States · United States v. Myers · Boyd v. North Carolina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'in defiance of the ruling of the court, . . . intentionally for the purpose of getting before the jury facts or statements not admissible, and calculated to prejudice the judgment of the jury. . . .'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“prejudice the accused by suggesting that he was more likely to be guilty of the crime[s] in question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“' Mayberry v. State , 419 So.2d 262 , 268 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.