Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 478 SO2D 326 - Allen v. State

Allen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 1997
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Angrist v. United States · Cherek v. United States · Cleveland v. United States · United States v. Myers · Boyd v. North Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'in defiance of the ruling of the court, . . . intentionally for the purpose of getting before the jury facts or statements not admissible, and calculated to prejudice the judgment of the jury. . . .'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “prejudice the accused by suggesting that he was more likely to be guilty of the crime[s] in question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “' Mayberry v. State , 419 So.2d 262 , 268 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.