Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 478 SW2D 172 - Ellis v. Hanks

Ellis v. Hanks’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1985
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ramsey v. Dunlop · Scott v. Graham · Sharpe v. Landowners Oil Assn. · Petroleum Anchor Equipment, Inc. v. Tyra · Sun Vapor Electric Light Co. v. Keenan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . It shall be the duty of the county clerk to check the names of the signers of any such petition, and the voting precincts in which they reside to determine whether or not the signers of such petition were in fact qualified voters in such county, justice precinct, or incorporated city or town at the time such petition was issued, and to certify to the commissioners court the number of qualified voters signing such petition . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . our Supreme Court in Manion v. Lockhart, 131 Tex. 175 , 114 S.W.2d 216, 219 (1938), said that the law is well settled that a writ of mandamus will not issue where the issuance of such writ would be fruitless or futile. More recently the same rule was reiterated in Parks v. Elliott, 465 S.W.2d 434 (Tex.Civ.App., Houston (14th Dist.) 1971).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.